Rulings
HC: PhonePe not exclusive user of expression “Pe”; Rejects plea seeking to restrain “DigiPe”
HC: Adding prefix to essential feature of TM “MAYO” unlikely to dispel confusion, grants injunction
HC: Permanently restrains hospitality company from using TATA Group company’s TM “VIVANTA”, imposes cost
HC: Denies injunction favoring Times Group claiming ‘prior use’ of logos “NOW”, “E NOW”
HC: “Constitution doesn’t permit writ jurisdiction over private contracts”; Dismisses petition in TM infringement-dispute
HC: Bars over 100 rogue websites from streaming movie “Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse”
HC: Restrains advertising, selling of candies bearing mark “PULLS” infringing well-known TM “PULSE”
HC: Vacates injunction against real-estate Co. from using TM “CENTRAL PARK”, subject to caveat
HC: Quashes Single-Judge order rejecting BharatPe’s plea seeking rectification of PhonePe’s registered trademarks
HC: No disparagement of Dettol in Wipro’s “Santoor” ad; Comparative-advertising, short of denigration, permitted